I believe that the legal drinking age in America should be
18. Not just because I am 18 but because I believe that the saying “when you
turn 18 you’re an adult” says it all about us being able to drink. If we are adults,
then we are capable of making adult decisions. In other countries, they are
taught more about drinking at a younger age then we are ever taught. I believe
that if drinking awareness would be taught more in school then having the
drinking age be 18 we may be even more capable of making decisions. Even adults
die in car accidents from drunk driving it isn’t always just teenage drinking. Both
writers David J. Hanson and William De Jong have valid points in both of their
articles. Hanson talks about how we should have a license to drink if we are of the age pf 18-20, we would take a course as we would if we were getting our drivers license. De Jong’s article
talks about how if one thing were to happen it wouldn’t change the outcome at
hand, he believes the drinking age should stay at 21. Although I do believe
that the drinking age should or could be 18 I like the way William De Jong has
his article written. Hanson’s article was written well but I believe that his arguments in some way aren't very reasonable as De Jong's are. Hanson’s argument about how alcohol doesn’t damage your brains like
everyone says it does is very intriguing, because he brings up how people in
other countries that allow kids to drink young do not have any brain defects. Although
my opinion still has not changed about the drinking age, I do believe that both
writers mad good points about both sides.
Very well said. I agree.
ReplyDeleteI agree with you ! If they say were legal at 18 why not let the drinking age be 18?!
ReplyDeleteYour thoughts and point of view are very well stated.
ReplyDeleteYou've made an interesting claim here that "Hanson's article was written well but I believe that his arguments in some ways aren't very reasonable". I'd like to hear more about this. What did Hanson do, as a writer, that caught your eye? You've illustrated the point that often times we can appreciate an argument we still disagree with. Good on you.
ReplyDelete